A de minimis shipment, also called a Section 321 shipment, allows for goods valued at $800 US Dollars or less to enter duty-free into the United States. Section 321 (19 U.S.C. 1321) is the statute that describes de minimis. With the passage of the Trade Facilitation and Trade Enforcement Act (TFTEA) (2016), the value amount increased from $200 to $800. Significantly, importers are permitted to enter these de minimis value shipments of goods without making a formal entry with Customs, such as on a Form 7501. This regulation provides a great option for importers to save money and time. However there are restrictions (listed below):

 Section 321 Restrictions

  • Goods needing inspection as a condition of release (regardless of value)
  • Quota-class merchandise
  • Merchandise subject to Anti-Dumping Duty (ADD) and/or Countervailing Duties (CVD)
  • Products regulated by the following agencies:
  1. U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA)
  2. Food Safety Inspection Service (FSIS)
  3. National Highway Transport and Safety Administration (NHTSA)
  4. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSA)
  5. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) *

*However, as of July 2017, the FDA provided exemptions for this restriction for the following goods:

  • Food (excluding ackees, puffer fish, raw clams, raw oysters, raw mussels, and foods packed in airtight containers stored at room temperature)
  • Biological samples for laboratory testing
  • Cosmetics
  • Radiation-emitting non-medical devices
  • Dinnerware

Further FDA guidance is available here:

Potential Import Compliance Pitfalls

Although the Section 321 shipment option reduces the amount of paperwork required for low-value shipments, it does create some  potential compliance pitfalls. Notably, the single transaction requirement. The Section 321 benefit applies only to shipments of articles imported by one person (e.g., a company) on one day. As a consequence, importers can only take advantage of the Section 321 benefit on one single transaction per day.

 Often, carriers may elect to make the Section 321 claim to expedite the clearance process. An importer’s carrier will need to provide the section 321 goods details and paperwork to CBP officials upon request. Because it is not a formal entry, no entry number is provided for section 321 shipments. However, an importer may make a self-filing.

Importers may choose to file informal entries without using Customs brokers. 

Once the carrier notifies the importer of the shipment’s arrival date, the importer must personally inform the entry port’s Customs office that they will file an informal entry to process and pick up the merchandise.  Importers making self-filings will need invoices, bills of sale and valid identification if they want to claim the goods personally at the port.

If the merchandise is arriving at a distant port, and the importer has not arranged for freight or courier service, the importer can authorize another person to clear the goods on their behalf by writing a letter to the CBP Port Director.  The letter must include sufficient details about the shipment proving that the rightful owners of the merchandise. Any shipments that are not picked up within 15 days of arrival will be sent to a warehouse and the recipient will be responsible for the storage fees.  Goods unclaimed after six months in the warehouse may be sold at auctions.

How to Declare a Section 321 Shipment

  1. Within the ACE eManifest select the shipment type ‘section 321.’
  2. Enter a shipment control number for the goods.
  3. Include goods details including shipper, consignee, value, commodity, and country of origin.
  4. Submit the eManifest to CBP

Avoiding CBP Penalties and Problems

In order to avoid penalties as a result of multiple transactions per day, importers may wish to consider controlling their shipment filings in the following manner:

  • Identify the particular shipment the Section 321 claim will be used each day.
  • Use a customs broker to ensure consistent filing of import/export transactions.
  • Communicate regularly with the logistics team including carriers, freight forwarders, and customs brokers.

If you have any questions regarding these de minimis shipments or are interested in developing a program to take advantage of this benefit please contact our team.

 

 

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of John Brew John Brew

John Brew is the co-chair of Crowell & Moring’s International Trade Group and a partner in the firm’s Washington, D.C. office. He has extensive experience in import and export trade regulation, and he regularly advises corporations, trade associations, foreign governments, and non-governmental organizations…

John Brew is the co-chair of Crowell & Moring’s International Trade Group and a partner in the firm’s Washington, D.C. office. He has extensive experience in import and export trade regulation, and he regularly advises corporations, trade associations, foreign governments, and non-governmental organizations on matters involving customs administration, enforcement, compliance, litigation, legislation and policy.

John represents clients in proceedings at the administrative and judicial levels, as well as before Congress and the international bureaucracies that handle customs and trade matters. He advises clients on all substantive import regulatory issues handled by U.S. Customs and Border Protection and Immigration and Customs Enforcement, such as classification, valuation, origin, marking, tariff preference programs, other agency regulations, admissibility, import restrictions, quotas, drawback, audits, prior disclosures, penalties, investigations, Importer Self Assessment and Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism programs, importations under bond, the Jones Act, vessel repairs, and foreign trade zone matters.

Photo of Frances P. Hadfield Frances P. Hadfield

Frances P. Hadfield is a counsel in Crowell & Moring’s International Trade Group in the firm’s New York office. Her practice focuses on forced labor and withhold release orders (WRO), import regulatory compliance, and customs litigation. She regularly advises corporations on matters involving…

Frances P. Hadfield is a counsel in Crowell & Moring’s International Trade Group in the firm’s New York office. Her practice focuses on forced labor and withhold release orders (WRO), import regulatory compliance, and customs litigation. She regularly advises corporations on matters involving customs compliance, audits, customs enforcement, as well as import penalties.

Frances represents clients before the U.S. Court of International Trade and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, as well as in proceedings at the administrative level. She advises corporations on both substantive federal and state regulatory issues that involve U.S. Customs and Border Protection, the Federal Trade Commission, Food and Drug Administration, and U.S. Fish & Wildlife in matters pertaining to product admissibility, audits, classification, import restrictions, investigations, marking, licenses, origin, penalties, and tariff preference programs.

Photo of Maria Vanikiotis Maria Vanikiotis

Maria Vanikiotis is a counsel in the International Trade Group of Crowell & Moring and resident in the firm’s New York office.

Maria has experience in a variety of matters related to the movement of goods across international borders, including problem-solving for importers

Maria Vanikiotis is a counsel in the International Trade Group of Crowell & Moring and resident in the firm’s New York office.

Maria has experience in a variety of matters related to the movement of goods across international borders, including problem-solving for importers facing Section 232 and Section 301 tariffs, classification of merchandise under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule, first sale appraisement programs, free trade agreement origin verifications, country of origin analyses, and other regulatory issues.

Before joining Crowell & Moring, Maria worked for a boutique law firm in New York focusing on customs law and, while in law school, Maria was employed as a summer associate in the Brussels office of a large international law firm on matters related to antitrust and competition law within the European Union. As a law student, Maria published a note comparing collective action approaches to antitrust cases in the U.S., U.K., and E.U., for which she won an award for outstanding legal writing. In addition, Maria was an active and accomplished member of both the Fordham International Law Journal and the Dispute Resolution Society.