In ruling NY N321794 (October 14, 2021), Customs and Border Protection (CBP) discussed the tariff classification of an ultrasonic and UV sanitizer from China. The item, described as an ultrasonic cleaner with wireless charging sanitizer, is rectangular in nature and measures approximately 7 inches long by 7 inches wide by 1.5 inches deep. Within the item’s waterproof reservoir, located inside, are two UV-C LED lights designed to sanitize any article that is placed within. The unit also contains ultrasound technology to allow for ultrasonic sterilization of items. The top of the unit has a wireless charger that allows users to charge personal electronic devices – such as cell phones. When in use, the desired article to be sanitized is placed within the reservoir machine. The user may then select from the control panel whether they’d like to clean the item or sanitize it through ultrasonic or UV means. If the ultrasonic option is chosen, the unit is filled with water and the ultrasonic technology will agitate the water, cleaning the item. If the UV option is chosen, the article is bombarded with UV light, which destroys virtually all microorganisms.

In considering the classification of the item, CBP noted that it considered the subject sanitizer a composite good representing functions that are covered by multiple headings within the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). As such, CBP derived its classification from the rules set forth by General Rule of Interpretation (GRI) 3(b) and 3(c). GRI 3(b) states that “composite goods are classified as if they are comprised of the function that provides the finished product its essential character.” CBP determined that the ultrasonic cleaning function, UV cleaning function, and charging function do not provide the essential character of the good as they’re all of equal importance to end users. As such, CBP turned to GRI 3(c), which states that “goods are classified by the heading that falls last in numerical order.” The headings for the ultrasonic cleaning function, charging function, and UV function are 8479, 8504, and 8543, respectively.

Thus, for its determination, CBP concluded that the applicable subheading for the ultrasonic and UV sanitizer is 8543.70.9960, HTSUS, which provides for “Electrical machines and apparatus, having individual functions, not specified or included elsewhere in this chapter; Other machines and apparatus; …Other.”  The general rate of duty is 2.6% ad valorem.

Additionally, pursuant to U.S. Note 20 to Subchapter III, Chapter 99, HTSUS, Chinese products under subheading 8543.70.9960, HTSUS, unless specifically excluded, are subject to an additional 25% ad valorem duty rate. As such, the chapter subheading 9903.88.02 must be reported in addition to subheading 8543.70.9960, HTSUS.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Frances P. Hadfield Frances P. Hadfield

Frances P. Hadfield is a counsel in Crowell & Moring’s International Trade Group in the firm’s New York office. Her practice focuses on forced labor and withhold release orders (WRO), import regulatory compliance, and customs litigation. She regularly advises corporations on matters involving…

Frances P. Hadfield is a counsel in Crowell & Moring’s International Trade Group in the firm’s New York office. Her practice focuses on forced labor and withhold release orders (WRO), import regulatory compliance, and customs litigation. She regularly advises corporations on matters involving customs compliance, audits, customs enforcement, as well as import penalties.

Frances represents clients before the U.S. Court of International Trade and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, as well as in proceedings at the administrative level. She advises corporations on both substantive federal and state regulatory issues that involve U.S. Customs and Border Protection, the Federal Trade Commission, Food and Drug Administration, and U.S. Fish & Wildlife in matters pertaining to product admissibility, audits, classification, import restrictions, investigations, marking, licenses, origin, penalties, and tariff preference programs.

Read more about Frances P. Hadfield
Show more Show less
Photo of Martín Yerovi Martín Yerovi

Martín Yerovi is an international trade analyst in Crowell & Moring’s Washington, D.C. office. He provides practice support to the International Trade Group on import regulatory matters pending before the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) and U.S. Customs and Border Protection…

Martín Yerovi is an international trade analyst in Crowell & Moring’s Washington, D.C. office. He provides practice support to the International Trade Group on import regulatory matters pending before the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP). He works closely with attorneys developing courses of action for clients impacted by investigations under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 and Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962. He also supports unfair trade investigations, including antidumping (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) investigations, sunset reviews, and changed circumstance reviews before the Department of Commerce and the International Trade Commission (ITC).

Read more about Martín Yerovi
Show more Show less
Related Posts
22.4.19 - ROW - Outdoor Security Camera
Customs Ruling of the Week -- Classification of Outdoor Security Camera System
April 19, 2022
22.4.12 - ROW - Sense Asset+ Device
Customs Ruling of the Week - Country of Origin of a Locating and Tracking Device
April 12, 2022
22.3.30 - ROW - Pin Pad
Customs Ruling of the Week - Country of Origin of Pin Pad Device
March 31, 2022