In ruling HQ H325781 (Aug. 31, 2022), Customs and Border Protection (CBP) affirmed the tariff classification of the Efficient Lemonade Base in NY N325564 (May 16, 2022).  This item is a Lemonade Base in liquid form, which contains approximately 40% water, 39% not-from-concentrate (NFC) lemon juice, and 22% granulated beet sugar with trace amounts of lemon oil.  The production of this Lemonade Base requires combining and pasteurizing the ingredients in a food-grade stainless steel tank.  The resulting product is packed by aseptic filling and closing into multi-laminate paperboard cartons.

This Lemonade Base will be imported at a baseline temperature and then sold to domestic restaurant operators (the distributors) as an ingredient for lemonade, which can be made by diluting the Lemonade Base.  This product is not intended for consumer or retail household use.  Instead, the operator will distribute the Lemonade Base to individual restaurants (the end-users).  The end-users will use and prepare the product to create and sell lemonade and lemonade-containing drinks to individual consumers.  The product packaging will list the preparation instructions, which requires the operator to combine 0.75 liters of the Lemonade Base with 1.25 liters of water, followed by mixing with a whisk.

CBP first determines that the Lemonade Base is not classified in subheading 2009.39.6040, HTSUS, as a fruit juice.  The Explanatory Notes (ENs) to heading 2009, HTSUS, state fruit juice of this heading may contain sugar, provided the fruit juice retains its original character as a fruit juice.  In this instance, CBP finds that the amount of sugar added to the lemon juice to make the Lemonade Base changes the product from a lemon juice – which would be classifiable under heading 2009, HTSUS – to a lemonade beverage.  CBP makes this determination based on the percentage of sugar added (21.5%) and the brix value of lemon juice (5.0-10.0) as compared with the Lemonade base (25.05).  As such, because the amount of sugar added to the product alters its original character as a lemon juice, CBP found that it could not be classified under heading 2009, HTSUS.

In contrast, the Lemonade Base is specifically described in the EN(12) to heading 2106, HTSUS, which provides for “[p]reparations for the manufacture of lemonades or other beverages … preparations [that] are intended to be consumed as beverages after simple dilution with water or after further treatment.”  The Lemonade Base product, which requires diluting the product with water and stirred for use and consequently meets the food preparation requirements as outlined by heading 2106, HTSUS.  At the subheading level, subheading 2106.10, HTSUS, is not applicable because it covers only protein concentrates and textured protein substances.  Classification, therefore, is appropriate under subheading 2106.90, HTSUS, which covers “other” food preparations.

The analysis then turns to classification at the 8-digit level.  CBP considers subheading 2106.90.9500, HTSUS, which provides for other food preparations “containing over 10% by dry weight of sugar described in additional U.S. note 3 to chapter 17” and “described in additional U.S. note 8 to chapter 17 and entered pursuant to its provisions.”

Additional U.S. note 3 to chapter 17 defines the term “articles containing 10% by dry weight of sugar” means articles containing over 10% by dry weight of sugars derived from sugar cane or sugar beets, whether or not mixed with other ingredients – subject to certain listed exceptions. See HTSUS, Ch. 17, U.S. Note 3 (2022 rev. 9).  The Lemonade Base at issue contains 21.5% by dry weight of granulated beet sugar and is imported in liquid form and in bulk for certain domestic restaurant operators (and not for retail sale or retail household use).  The Lemonade Base meets the terms of this note.

Additional U.S. note 8 to chapter 17 represents a quantitative limitation (or a quota).  The note states that the aggregate quantity of articles containing over 10% by dry weight of sugars described in additional U.S. note 3 to chapter 17, entered under certain enumerated subheadings (including 2106.90.95) during the 12-month period from October 1 in any year to the following September 30, inclusive, “shall not exceed 64,709 metric tons” – excluding Mexican-origin products (which are not permitted or included in this quantitative limitation). See HTSUS, Ch. 17, U.S. Note 8 (2022 rev. 9).  Notably, if the quantitative limits of this note are reached, then classification under subheading 2106.90.9500, HTSUS, is no longer permissible.  In that case, articles that meet the terms of Additional U.S. note 3 to chapter 17 must be classified under subheading 2106.90.9700, HTSUS, which provides for other such articles.

Therefore, the Lemonade Base at issue, if imported in quantities within the limits described in additional U.S. note 8 to chapter 17 and entered pursuant to its provisions, is properly classified under subheading 2106.90.9500, HTSUS, which carries a general duty rate of 10% ad valorem.  In turn, if the quantitative limits of U.S. note 8 to chapter 17 have been reached, then the Lemonade Base is properly classified under subheading 2106.90.9700, HTSUS, which applies a general duty rate of 28.8¢/kg + 8.5% ad valorem.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Maria Vanikiotis Maria Vanikiotis

Maria Vanikiotis is a counsel in the International Trade Group of Crowell & Moring and resident in the firm’s New York office.

Maria has experience in a variety of matters related to the movement of goods across international borders, including problem-solving for importers

Maria Vanikiotis is a counsel in the International Trade Group of Crowell & Moring and resident in the firm’s New York office.

Maria has experience in a variety of matters related to the movement of goods across international borders, including problem-solving for importers facing Section 232 and Section 301 tariffs, classification of merchandise under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule, first sale appraisement programs, free trade agreement origin verifications, country of origin analyses, and other regulatory issues.

Before joining Crowell & Moring, Maria worked for a boutique law firm in New York focusing on customs law and, while in law school, Maria was employed as a summer associate in the Brussels office of a large international law firm on matters related to antitrust and competition law within the European Union. As a law student, Maria published a note comparing collective action approaches to antitrust cases in the U.S., U.K., and E.U., for which she won an award for outstanding legal writing. In addition, Maria was an active and accomplished member of both the Fordham International Law Journal and the Dispute Resolution Society.

Photo of Emily Devereaux Emily Devereaux

Emily Devereaux is a senior international trade analyst I in Crowell & Moring’s Washington, D.C. office. She provides practice support to the International Trade Group on import regulatory matters pending before the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) and U.S. Customs and

Emily Devereaux is a senior international trade analyst I in Crowell & Moring’s Washington, D.C. office. She provides practice support to the International Trade Group on import regulatory matters pending before the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP). She works closely with attorneys developing courses of action for clients impacted by investigations under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 and Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962. She also supports unfair trade investigations, including antidumping (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) investigations, sunset reviews, and changed circumstance reviews before the Department of Commerce and the International Trade Commission (ITC).