“Several thousands” of vehicles from German luxury brands including Porsche, Bentley, and Audi have been detained at U.S. ports following the discovery of a Chinese subcomponent violating U.S. anti-forced labor laws. The parent company, Volkswagen Group, had sourced a key electronic component through a supplier further down the company’s supply chain and was unaware of the part’s origin from “western China” until notified by the supplier in mid-January of this year. U.S. Customs and Border Protection prohibits the import of products that have been made with forced labor in Xinjiang and other areas in China under the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act of 2021 (UFLPA).

Volkswagen had previously commissioned an audit carried out by a Chinese law firm, which had found “no indication of forced labor” at its distribution plant located in Urumqi, the capital of China’s Xinjiang region. The plant is part of a joint venture between Volkswagen and SAIC Motor, a major Chinese automaker. A Human Rights Watch report released earlier this month has noted that foreign automakers in China are at an “increased risk” of acquiring aluminum produced by victims of forced labor in Xinjiang. On Wednesday, February 14, 2024, a spokesperson from Volkswagen stated that the company is now examining “a reorganization of its activities in the Chinese region of Xinjiang in light of possible human rights violations.”

Although this can be considered a large detainment of vehicles, it does follow a series of investigations launched by the US Senate and Finance Committee earlier in March. The committee sent a letter to the CEO of Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. requesting whether Volkswagen monitors Chinese suppliers, specifically trying to understand how Volkswagen assess and mitigates risk of subcomponents which could originate from the Xinjiang region.

This incident highlights the impact of tensions between the U.S. and China on global trade, particularly concerning human rights and forced labor. The incident also underscores the increased difficulties businesses currently face in maintaining ethical operations and effective compliance amidst evolving regulatory environments.

Crowell & Moring, LLP continue to monitor this development and the potential impact to businesses and consumers moving forward.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Dmitry Bergoltsev Dmitry Bergoltsev

Dmitry Bergoltsev is a senior international trade analyst in Crowell & Moring’s Washington, D.C. office. He provides practice support to the International Trade Group on import regulatory matters pending before the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) and U.S. Customs and Border

Dmitry Bergoltsev is a senior international trade analyst in Crowell & Moring’s Washington, D.C. office. He provides practice support to the International Trade Group on import regulatory matters pending before the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP). He works closely with attorneys developing courses of action for clients impacted by investigations under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 and Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962. He also supports unfair trade investigations, including antidumping (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) investigations, sunset reviews, and changed circumstance reviews before the Department of Commerce and the International Trade Commission (ITC).

Photo of John Brew John Brew

John Brew is the co-chair of Crowell & Moring’s International Trade Group and a partner in the firm’s Washington, D.C. office. He has extensive experience in import and export trade regulation, and he regularly advises corporations, trade associations, foreign governments, and non-governmental organizations…

John Brew is the co-chair of Crowell & Moring’s International Trade Group and a partner in the firm’s Washington, D.C. office. He has extensive experience in import and export trade regulation, and he regularly advises corporations, trade associations, foreign governments, and non-governmental organizations on matters involving customs administration, enforcement, compliance, litigation, legislation and policy.

John represents clients in proceedings at the administrative and judicial levels, as well as before Congress and the international bureaucracies that handle customs and trade matters. He advises clients on all substantive import regulatory issues handled by U.S. Customs and Border Protection and Immigration and Customs Enforcement, such as classification, valuation, origin, marking, tariff preference programs, other agency regulations, admissibility, import restrictions, quotas, drawback, audits, prior disclosures, penalties, investigations, Importer Self Assessment and Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism programs, importations under bond, the Jones Act, vessel repairs, and foreign trade zone matters.

Photo of Pierfilippo M. Natta Pierfilippo M. Natta

Pierfilippo M. Natta (“Pier”), is an associate in Crowell’s International Trade Law practice. He focuses on assisting clients with complex international trade matters, ranging from implementing sanctions and export controls programs to forced labor investigations and general trade disputes. Pier works on developing…

Pierfilippo M. Natta (“Pier”), is an associate in Crowell’s International Trade Law practice. He focuses on assisting clients with complex international trade matters, ranging from implementing sanctions and export controls programs to forced labor investigations and general trade disputes. Pier works on developing Business and Human Rights legal guidance for clients and his practice covers a global reach including US, EU and Asia. His investigatory work has primarily focused on South-East Asia.

Pier applies his international trade knowledge to help clients identify manage and remediate risks. He has advised U.S. and global companies on developing programs specific to UN, US, and EU sanctions. More recently, Pier and the Crowell team are working to develop Crowell’s Business and Human Rights sub-practice which includes Crowell’s anti-forced labor investigatory work.