In ruling NY N317621 (March 4, 2021), Customs and Border Protection (CBP) discussed the classification of jewelry pieces. As described in the ruling, style number 60549843-276 is a pair of dangling silver and blue earrings.  The components include base metal lever backs, base metal drop-shaped castings, and drop-shaped reconstituted calcite stones. Style number 60549853-H46 is a silver, turquoise, teal, and blue bracelet.  The components include base metal castings, plastic stones, reconstituted turquoise stones, and a reconstituted calcite stone.

CBP determined that the applicable subheading for the earrings and bracelet is 7116.20.0500, HTSUS, which provides for “Articles of natural or cultured pearls, precious or semi-precious stones (natural, synthetic or reconstructed): Of precious or semiprecious stones (natural, synthetic or reconstructed): Articles of jewelry: Valued not over $40 per piece.”  The rate of duty is 3.3% ad valorem.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Frances P. Hadfield Frances P. Hadfield

Frances P. Hadfield is a counsel in Crowell & Moring’s International Trade Group in the firm’s New York office. Her practice focuses on forced labor and withhold release orders (WRO), import regulatory compliance, and customs litigation. She regularly advises corporations on matters involving…

Frances P. Hadfield is a counsel in Crowell & Moring’s International Trade Group in the firm’s New York office. Her practice focuses on forced labor and withhold release orders (WRO), import regulatory compliance, and customs litigation. She regularly advises corporations on matters involving customs compliance, audits, customs enforcement, as well as import penalties.

Frances represents clients before the U.S. Court of International Trade and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, as well as in proceedings at the administrative level. She advises corporations on both substantive federal and state regulatory issues that involve U.S. Customs and Border Protection, the Federal Trade Commission, Food and Drug Administration, and U.S. Fish & Wildlife in matters pertaining to product admissibility, audits, classification, import restrictions, investigations, marking, licenses, origin, penalties, and tariff preference programs.

Read more about Frances P. Hadfield
Show more Show less
Related Posts
Update on Parallel Federal Court Cases Enjoining IEEPA
June 6, 2025
District Court Denies Motion to Move Venue, Grants Preliminary Injunction
May 29, 2025
Court of International Trade Blocks IEEPA Tariffs
May 28, 2025