On Friday, the U.S. Department of Commerce Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) issued its latest set of export controls in response to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. The broadest expansion of U.S. export controls on Russia since last fall, Friday’s actions are separate and distinct from the new sanctions regulations imposed by the U.S. Department of the Treasury Office of Foreign Assets Controls (OFAC). Both sets of controls are in coordination with the United States’ allies, resulting in the United Kingdom and Australia imposing their own controls, and the European Union’s control expected soon.

For companies still directly or indirectly dealing with Russia, robust rescreening compliance programs are essential to confirm that third parties with whom the company deals, and items proposed for export to Russia, are not caught by the new rules. This includes analyzing third parties in China that are likely to resell to Russia. The rule does include one notable benefit for U.S. companies, BIS has implemented measures to expedite the process of exiting from Russia.

A summary follows of major components of the new export controls:  

  • Entity List Designations: BIS designated 79 Russian entities, five Chinese entities, two Canadian entities, one French entity, one Luxembourg entity, and one Netherlands entity on the Entity List. All exports, reexports, and transfers to these persons of items subject to the EAR now require a license.
  • Russia/Belarus Military End User FDP Rule: BIS also confirmed that the Russia/Belarus military end user foreign direct product rule applies to 66 (of the 79) Russian entities.
  • Iran Foreign Direct Product Rule & Drone Restrictions: BIS created a new list of items identified by HTS listed in a new Supplement No. 7 to 15 C.F.R. § 746, comprised of items that are parts and components related to unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) that Iran has used in the drones it sells to Russia. Additionally, BIS created the Iran Foreign Direct Product Rule which applies to items listed in Supp. No. 7 or are in Categories 3, 4, 5, or 7 of the Commerce Control List, and that are the direct product of certain U.S. origin technology or software. BIS also modified the Russia/Belarus foreign direct product rules to include items listed in Supp. No. 7.
  • Expansion of Russian/Belarussian Unconventional Oil and Gas Export Controls: BIS updated the list of parts controlled for export, reexport, or transfer to unconventional Russian/Belarussian oil and gas exploration and production to identify the items controlled using the HTS Code (as opposed to the Schedule B) and to note that items not listed by HTS code, but that are parts, components, accessories, or attachments (that are not minor, e.g., screws and bolts) for an item listed via HTS code, are also controlled.
  • Expansion of Listed Items Controlled for Export to Russia and Belarus: BIS identified over 500 new items to include in Supplement Nos. 4, 5, and 6 to 15 C.F.R. § 746 that are now prohibited for export, reexport, or transfer to Russia. The items identified in Supplement No. 6 are also subject to the Russia/Belarus foreign direct product rules
  • Taiwan Exemption: BIS added Taiwan to the list of the countries exempt from the Russia/Belarus regular and military end user foreign direct product rules, as well as certain of the de minimis requirements.
  • Exiting Russia: Significantly, BIS changed its licensing posture for companies exiting Russia and will review license requests to dispose of items on a case-by-case basis (as opposed to the previous policy of denial), thereby potentially easing the licensing process for companies’ exiting from Russia. However, OFAC clarified in FAQ 1118 that any “exit tax” that Russia may impose on U.S. persons could require a license from OFAC if it is paid to Russian sanctioned persons.
Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Jana del-Cerro Jana del-Cerro

Maria Alejandra (Jana) del-Cerro is a partner in Crowell & Moring’s Washington, D.C. office and a member of the firm’s International Trade and Government Contracts groups. She advises clients with respect to the U.S. regulation of outbound trade, including U.S. export controls. Jana

Maria Alejandra (Jana) del-Cerro is a partner in Crowell & Moring’s Washington, D.C. office and a member of the firm’s International Trade and Government Contracts groups. She advises clients with respect to the U.S. regulation of outbound trade, including U.S. export controls. Jana works with clients across a broad range of industries, from traditional aerospace and defense manufacturers and multi-national software companies, to start-ups in the technology sector, and she regularly represents them before the Departments of State, Commerce, and Treasury in responding to government inquiries, conducting internal reviews, and in compliance investigations and voluntary disclosures.

Photo of Jeremy Iloulian Jeremy Iloulian

Recognized as a “Rising Star” in International Trade by Super Lawyers, Jeremy Iloulian advises clients globally on complex cross-border regulatory, compliance, investigative, and transactional matters and policy developments that touch U.S. national security, international trade, and foreign investment, including those relating to

Recognized as a “Rising Star” in International Trade by Super Lawyers, Jeremy Iloulian advises clients globally on complex cross-border regulatory, compliance, investigative, and transactional matters and policy developments that touch U.S. national security, international trade, and foreign investment, including those relating to U.S. export controls (EAR and ITAR), economic sanctions, anti-boycott laws, the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS), and various national security controls on fundamental research and supply chains.

Jeremy has extensive experience counseling U.S. and non-U.S. clients, including public and private companies, private equity sponsors, and nonprofits spanning a multitude of industries, including aerospace and defense, energy, entertainment, fashion, food and beverage, health care, infrastructure, technology, telecommunications, and transportation. He provides strategic guidance on managing risks for dealings in high-risk jurisdictions such as China, Russia, Venezuela, and the Middle East, among other countries and regions. He regularly advocates on behalf of such clients before the U.S. Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS), Directorate of Defense Trade Controls (DDTC), Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), Bureau of Economic Affairs (BEA), Census Bureau, Department of Energy, and Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC).

Additionally, Jeremy has previously counseled on, presented on, and published research related to international environmental law, specifically the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) and Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES).

Prior to and during law school, Jeremy interned at multiple government agencies, including the United Nations, the U.S. State Department, and the Iraqi Embassy in Washington, D.C.