Earlier this week, the U.S. government partially re-implemented certain recently relaxed sanctions against Venezuela. According to a statement released by the United States Department of State on January 30th, the absence of meaningful progress in allowing candidates of the opposition Unitary Platform to stand for office in the upcoming Venezuelan presidential election has led to the re-imposition of economic measures designed to deprive the Maduro government of funding.

The Biden Administration has set an April deadline for the Maduro regime to uphold his commitments under the Barbados Agreement, signed in October of 2023. If no progress is made between Maduro’s United Socialist Party of Venezuela (PSUV) and the opposition Unitary Platform by April 18, the remainder of the recently relaxations are likely to expire, leading to the re-imposition of energy related sanctions.

Actions Taken

In October, in exchange for commitments made by the Maduro Government related to permitting opposition politicians to participate in upcoming elections, the United States issued a series of general licenses that had the effect of relaxing certain aspects of the U.S. Venezuela program.  At the time, the United States issued guidance that those relaxations could be rescinded “should the representatives of Maduro fail to follow through on their commitments….”

The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (“OFAC”) has begin to act on that warning in response to a decision last week by the Venezuelan Supreme Court to bar a leading opposition candidate from the Venezuelan Presidential election.  In response, on January 29, 2024, OFAC first issued General License 43A, which had the functional effect of repealing the previous open-ended authorization to conduct activities involving CVG Compania General de Mineria de Venezuela CA (“Minerven”) that was provided for in General License 43, and instead requiring that those activities be wound-down by 12:01 AM on February 13, 2024.

The next day, on January 30, 2024, the State Department went further, issuing a statement that unless there were to be progress toward allowing “all presidential candidates to compete in this year’s election,” a pointed reference to the previous week’s Venezuelan court ruling, the United States would re-impose oil and gas related sanctions.  Specifically, in October, OFAC had issued General License 44 (“GL 44”), which authorized all activity prohibited by the Venezuelan Sanctions Regulations (including involving Venezuelan state-owned oil and gas company Petróleos de Venezuela, S.A. (PdVSA)) that was “related to oil or gas sector operations in Venezuela.”  GL 44 was originally only issued to authorize activity until 12:01 AM EDT on April 18, 2024 and OFAC had noted at the time that it would be renewed only if President Maduro continued to implement his commitments under the Barbados Agreement.  The State Department’s press release indicates that it does not currently view President Maduro as meeting those commitments and OFAC will, therefore, not be renewing GL 44 absent a change in behavior.     

Implications

The Venezuelan program remains quite volatile.  While the October relaxations represented the first material relaxations that the Biden Administration had implemented, they were explicitly tied to political progress in Venezuela.  As that progress appears is jeopardized in Venezuela, so too are the relaxations.

In practice, therefore, activity with Minerven has already become prohibited (again) and existing activity must be wound down in 14 days.  The re-imposition of oil and gas related sanctions would be commercially more material, given the importance of the sector to global trade, and OFAC has now given the market a 2.5 month advance warning that it anticipates re-imposing those sanctions absent changes in Venezuela.  The United States has effectively put its hand on the table and we will now actively monitor and wait to see what news comes from Venezuela.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Dj Wolff Dj Wolff

David (Dj) Wolff is the co-chair of Crowell & Moring’s International Trade Group and a director with C&M International, the firm’s trade policy affiliate.

At Crowell & Moring, he serves on the steering committee for the International Trade Group, where his practice focuses

David (Dj) Wolff is the co-chair of Crowell & Moring’s International Trade Group and a director with C&M International, the firm’s trade policy affiliate.

At Crowell & Moring, he serves on the steering committee for the International Trade Group, where his practice focuses on all aspects of compliance with U.S. economic sanctions, including day-to-day compliance guidance, developing compliance programs, responding to government inquiries, conducting internal investigations, and representation during civil and criminal enforcement proceedings. Dj works regularly with non-U.S. clients, both in Europe and Asia, to evaluate the jurisdictional reach of U.S. sanction authorities to their global operations, identify and manage the potential conflict of laws that can result from that reach, as well as to support client’s design, implementation, and evaluation of a corresponding risk-based sanctions compliance program. Dj also regularly leads teams in diligence efforts on trade and related regulatory areas on behalf of his U.S. and non-U.S. clients in the M&A arena, having successfully closed more than 30 deals with an aggregate valuation of several billion dollars over the last 18 months.

Dj is ranked by Chambers USA in International Trade: Export Controls & Economic Sanctions. He has previously been recognized by Law360 as a Rising Star in International Trade (2020), by The National Law Journal as a “DC Rising Star” (2019), by Who’s Who Legal: Investigations as a “Future Leader” (2018 and 2019), Acritas Star as an Acritas Stars Independently Rated Lawyers (2019), by Global Investigations Review as one of the “40 under 40” in Investigations internationally (2017), and WorldECR as one of the five finalists for the WorldECR Young Practitioner of the Year award (2016).

Andrew J. Schlegel

Andrew Schlegel is an international trade analyst III in Crowell & Moring’s Washington, D.C. office. He provides practice support to the International Trade Group on import regulatory matters pending before the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) and U.S. Customs and Border

Andrew Schlegel is an international trade analyst III in Crowell & Moring’s Washington, D.C. office. He provides practice support to the International Trade Group on import regulatory matters pending before the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP). He works closely with attorneys developing courses of action for clients impacted by investigations under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 and Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962. Andrew also supports unfair trade investigations, including antidumping (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) investigations, sunset reviews, and changed circumstance reviews before the Department of Commerce and the International Trade Commission (ITC).

Prior to joining Crowell & Moring, Andrew worked as an intern at SAP’s Government Affairs Business Development Team in Berlin, Germany. There, he analyzed the effects of regulatory changes on SAP business operations and expansion opportunities. Before this, he completed an internship at the International Trade Administration’s Office of Energy and Environmental Industries. While there, he developed the U.S. Energy Trade Dashboard, an interactive data visualization tool for use by professionals and researchers to analyze how energy supply chains have developed.