On December 16, 2024, the U.S. Department of Commerce published the final rule for Regulations Enhancing the Administration of the Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Trade Remedy Laws. Commerce’s final rule revised certain AD/CVD provisions, including those related to filing requirements, the application of cash deposits, indicators used in surrogate country selection, the application of antidumping rates in non-market economy proceedings, and the selection of examined respondents. The purpose of the amendments is to improve Commerce’s administrative processes, codify existing practices, and increase transparency around Commerce’s AD/CVD procedures and calculations.

Among the updated rules include modifications to how Commerce selects surrogate countries for respondents in non-market economies. Previously, Commerce chose surrogate countries on the basis of per-capita gross national income (GNI). Under the final rule amendments, Commerce will place primary emphasis on per capita gross domestic product (GDP) when selecting surrogate countries that are economically comparable to a nonmarket economy.

Additionally, Commerce revised its proposed separate rate regulation in this final rule. If Commerce determines that an entity in a third country is owned or controlled by a non-market economy government and that entity exports subject merchandise to the U.S., Commerce may determine to assign that entity a nonmarket economy entity rate. In this final rule, Commerce further clarified how it will determine if a nonmarket economy government controls an entity located in a third country, and under what circumstances entities will be subject to either a nonmarket economy rate or a separate rate.

In total, there were over twenty modifications made to the provisions in this final rule. The amendments are effective January 15, 2025.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Daniel Cannistra Daniel Cannistra

Dan Cannistra is a partner in the firm’s Washington, D.C. office. His practice focuses on legislative, executive and regulatory representation of domestic and international clients on a broad spectrum of international trade matters. Dan has represented domestic and foreign companies in over 75

Dan Cannistra is a partner in the firm’s Washington, D.C. office. His practice focuses on legislative, executive and regulatory representation of domestic and international clients on a broad spectrum of international trade matters. Dan has represented domestic and foreign companies in over 75 U.S. antidumping and countervailing duty cases before the U.S. Department of Commerce and the U.S. International Trade Commission under the Tariff Act of 1930. Many of these matters involved appeals to the U.S. Court of International Trade, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, binational panels under the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), and dispute settlement proceedings before the World Trade Organization (WTO). Dan has also represented clients in antidumping proceedings in the European Union, Canada, Mexico, Brazil, India, Thailand, Singapore, Guatemala and Taiwan.

Prior to joining Crowell & Moring, Dan was a director in a national accounting firm providing customs and international trade guidance to multinational clients related to the supply and distribution of goods and services across international borders. Areas of specialization included antidumping and countervailing duties and policy, trade remedies and litigation, free trade agreements and negotiations, classification and valuation, and international trade and development.

Dan’s government appointments include service to U.S. Trade Representative on the roster of international trade practitioners to resolve antidumping disputes involving NAFTA members. For the European Commission, Dan provided advice and training on international trade and antidumping methodology and practice. In addition, Dan has served as an international trade consultant to the governments of Guatemala and Singapore, providing technical advice to these governments on the application of international trade regulations consistent with international law and World Trade Organization agreements and the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, Agreement on Antidumping.