The U.S. Department of Commerce is seeking information and public comments regarding its use of the Cohen’s d test in assessing targeted dumping. Targeted dumping refers to the practice of selling goods at prices that differ significantly among particular purchasers, regions, or time periods. Under section 777A(d)(1)(B)(i) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, Commerce may apply the average-to-transaction comparison method if it identifies such a pattern and determines that the standard comparison methods cannot account for these differences.

Currently, Commerce uses the Cohen’s d test as part of its differential pricing analysis to identify whether there is a pattern of targeted dumping from respondents in antidumping cases. The test is meant to measure whether price differences among customers, regions, or time periods are large enough to be considered significant. This test has been part of Commerce’s antidumping analysis for more than ten years. However, it has faced criticism, especially when used on data that does not meet the test’s basic requirements.

In a Federal Register notice published on May 19, Commerce stated that it is looking into potential alternatives to its current approach for assessing targeted dumping. This comes after a decision at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in April, where the court concluded in Marmen Inc. vs. U.S. that Commerce’s use of the Cohen’s d test led to incorrect dumping margin calculations for a wind turbine importer.

The court criticized Commerce’s use of the test on data that did not meet the necessary statistical assumptions—specifically, normal distribution, equal variances, and sufficiently large sample sizes. Although Commerce notes that the Marmen decision is not yet final due to the possibility of rehearing or appeal, it has nevertheless initiated this comment process to evaluate whether alternative methodologies may better fulfill its statutory obligations.

The deadline for submitting public comments is May 30, 2025.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Pierce Lee Pierce Lee

Pierce J. Lee is a seasoned international trade attorney with a focus on trade remedies and customs laws. He has extensive experience representing clients in antidumping and countervailing duty investigations and administrative reviews. Pierce is also skilled in undertaking court appeals to challenge

Pierce J. Lee is a seasoned international trade attorney with a focus on trade remedies and customs laws. He has extensive experience representing clients in antidumping and countervailing duty investigations and administrative reviews. Pierce is also skilled in undertaking court appeals to challenge decisions by the U.S. Department of Commerce and the International Trade Commission.

Pierce specializes in all areas of international trade law, including antidumping, countervailing duty subsidies, circumvention, and Sections 201, 232, and 301 of the Trade Act of 1974. He regularly advises clients on complex customs and tariff issues involving classification, valuation, country of origin, tariff preferences (e.g., free trade agreements), quotas, marking, drawback, verification, audit, penalties, prior disclosure, and duty evasion under the Enforce and Protect Act.

He counsels and represents clients before the Department of Commerce (DOC), International Trade Commission (ITC), U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), Court of International Trade, and Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.  Pierce has served diverse clients across major industries, including steel, metals, automotive, tires, chemicals, textiles, and agriculture.

In addition to his experience in law firms, Pierce has also served as in-house counsel for one of the world’s largest steel manufacturers. During this time, he provided legal and strategic advice on international trade, customs, and government relations. This firsthand experience has equipped Pierce with a thorough understanding of corporate challenges, allowing him to offer tailored solutions and strategic insights across various aspects of international trade.

Photo of Ivy Xun Ivy Xun

Ivy Xun is an international trade analyst in Crowell & Moring’s Washington, D.C. office. She provides practice support to the International Trade Group on import regulatory matters pending before the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative and U.S. Customs and Border Protection. She…

Ivy Xun is an international trade analyst in Crowell & Moring’s Washington, D.C. office. She provides practice support to the International Trade Group on import regulatory matters pending before the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative and U.S. Customs and Border Protection. She works closely with attorneys developing courses of action for clients impacted by investigations under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 and Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962. Ivy also supports unfair trade investigations, including antidumping and countervailing duty investigations, sunset reviews, and changed circumstance reviews before the Department of Commerce and the International Trade Commission.