The snapback of UN sanctions on Iran took effect on September 27, 2025, after the E3 (France, Germany, UK) triggered the mechanism under UN Security Council Resolution 2231 and the Security Council failed to extend sanctions relief. Please see our previous Alert on the snapback process and what this could mean for global businesses.

The EU and UK have begun to re-impose on Iran their respective sanctions pre-dating the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA).

  • EU Actions: On September 29, the EU announced the re-imposition of a broad array of restrictive measures on Iran:
    • Council Regulation 2025/1975: Amends Council Regulation 267/2012, restoring sectoral and trade sanctions, including:
      • bans on the supply to Iran of nuclear and ballistic missile-related items, gold, precious metals, diamonds, certain software, and key equipment for the energy sector;
      • prohibitions on the import, purchase and transport of crude oil, gas, petrochemical and petroleum products and related services;
      • transport restrictions, such as prohibitions on providing services to Iranian vessels/aircraft suspected of carrying prohibited goods; and
      • various banking and financial restrictions, including with respect to the transfer of funds to and from Iran and prohibitions on new Iranian banking relationships.

Certain prohibitions are subject to time-bound wind-down provisions for pre-existing contracts.

The EU’s sanctions measures mirror the scope of EU sanctions on Iran prior to the 2013 Joint Plan of Action (an interim agreement between Iran and the P5, plus Germany, pursuant to which the EU suspended certain measures before its more fulsome lifting of sanctions post-JCPOA), and notably go further than the UN sanctions alone, including restrictions on energy, transport, and finance.

  • UK Actions: In parallel,  the UK has:
    • Passed regulations to amend the UK’s Iran nuclear sanctions regime (which, post-Brexit, is autonomous from the EU) to reflect the reintroduction of UN sanctions.  In particular, the amending regulations:
      • re-introduce references to UNSC Resolutions 1737, 1747, 1803 and 1929 (and the UK’s obligations under the same);
      • make technical amendments to ensure all lists of controlled items reflect UN Security Council control lists;
      • amend the asset freezing criteria to ensure there are grounds under UK law to designate UNSC sanctioned persons and entities; and
      • introduce an exemption enabling payments in respect of certain HMT sovereign debt products (in line with other sanctions regimes).
    • Updated its Sanctions List, adding 192 individuals and entities that are now subject to asset freezing sanctions.  These sanctioned individuals and entities include major Iranian banks, energy and petrochemical firms, government ministries, and companies linked to nuclear and missile proliferation.

The UK’s amendments to date are fairly contained since the UK (and EU) had maintained measures consistent with many of the UN sanctions on Iran. The UK has stated that it intends to bring in legislation to impose further sectoral measures, targeting “finance, energy, shipping, software, and other significant industries which are advancing Iranian nuclear escalation.”

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Erik Woodhouse Erik Woodhouse

Erik Woodhouse is a partner in Crowell & Moring’s Washington, D.C. office and a member of the firm’s International Trade and Financial Services groups, where he provides in-depth experience and practical solutions on sensitive economic sanctions and anti-money laundering matters, informed by his

Erik Woodhouse is a partner in Crowell & Moring’s Washington, D.C. office and a member of the firm’s International Trade and Financial Services groups, where he provides in-depth experience and practical solutions on sensitive economic sanctions and anti-money laundering matters, informed by his experience in private practice and in government at the Department of the Treasury and the Department of State.

Erik works with U.S. and foreign clients operating across borders on all aspects of these regimes, including developing and assessing compliance programs, advising on complex statutory and regulatory requirements, and leading companies through internal and government investigations. He has worked with major manufacturing and tech companies with global operations, multinational banks, investment funds and other financial services firms, and digital assets and virtual currency companies, collaborating with Crowell’s cross-disciplinary team that comprises former senior regulators, federal prosecutors, and in-house counsel.

Prior to joining Crowell, Erik served as Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Counter Threat Finance and Sanctions at the Department of State, where he played a key role in the Department’s policy development and implementation related to all U.S. country-based sanctions programs and a range of global programs. Erik worked with counterparts across the executive branch to establish and implement new sanctions programs, coordinated U.S. sanctions policy with foreign governments, and engaged with private sector stakeholders on a range of U.S. sanctions priorities. Erik’s prior government experience also includes service at the Department of the Treasury’s Office of International Affairs.

Earlier in his career, Erik worked as a project finance attorney and litigator, as a law clerk for the Honorable M. Margaret McKeown of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, and as a research fellow at Stanford University’s Program on Energy & Sustainable Development.

Photo of Sophie Davis Sophie Davis

Sophie Davis is an associate in Crowell’s London office and advises clients on a range of sanctions, export controls, and trade compliance matters. Sophie has particular experience advising multinational corporations and financial institutions on how to comply with rapidly evolving trade and financial

Sophie Davis is an associate in Crowell’s London office and advises clients on a range of sanctions, export controls, and trade compliance matters. Sophie has particular experience advising multinational corporations and financial institutions on how to comply with rapidly evolving trade and financial sanctions across a range of EU and UK sanctions regimes, assisting corporate clients with complex sanctions issues arising from their continued operations in, or divestments from, Russia, and supporting clients with licensing applications and responding to investigations.

Sophie also assists companies on compliance with anti-bribery and anti-money laundering laws, foreign direct investment requirements, human rights, environmental and sustainability regulatory requirements. Prior to joining Crowell & Moring, Sophie worked in the international trade and regulatory team in another top international law firm, based in London, as well as for a leading New Zealand law firm.

Photo of Tim Laderach Tim Laderach

Tim Laderach is an associate in Crowell & Moring’s Antitrust and International Trade practices. He creatively leverages his extensive military and healthcare background to help clients meet their business and legal objectives. His practice spans transactions, investigations, compliance, and regulatory advice.

Tim also

Tim Laderach is an associate in Crowell & Moring’s Antitrust and International Trade practices. He creatively leverages his extensive military and healthcare background to help clients meet their business and legal objectives. His practice spans transactions, investigations, compliance, and regulatory advice.

Tim also maintains an active pro bono practice representing clients seeking political asylum.

While in law school, Tim was a law clerk on Capitol Hill with the majority staff of the Senate Judiciary Committee. There, he authored a memo on competition issues with artificial intelligence (AI)-based pricing algorithms. He was also engaged in a wide variety of the committee’s portfolio, including agency oversight, hearing preparation, and legislative research for national security-related bills pending before the committee. Additionally, Tim has experience as an intern at the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) Healthcare Division. He was involved with a variety of conduct litigation and conducted initial research on Pharmacy Benefit Managers ahead of the current 6-B study.

Tim served on active duty in the U.S. Navy prior to law school. He completed tours as outpatient pharmacy division officer at Naval Hospital Jacksonville Florida and later as pharmacy department head at the Office of Attending Physician, U.S. Capitol. He continues his service now as an officer in the U.S. Navy Reserve.