The deadline to file OFAC’s Annual Report of Blocked Property (“ARBP”) is approaching fast.  All “U.S. persons” — including U.S. financial institutions, companies, and individuals — who hold property blocked pursuant to any OFAC sanctions program should take a moment to assess their reporting obligations, as set forth in 31 C.F.R. § 501.603.

This annual reporting obligation applies across all OFAC sanctions programs and covers a wide range of asset types — from bank accounts and wire transfers to securities, real estate, digital assets, and intangible property.

OFAC rules require all U.S. persons to report to OFAC by September 30, 2026, any blocked property they held as of June 30, 2026.

Who Must File an ARBP with OFAC?

  • Any U.S. person holding blocked property as of June 30, 2026.  A “U.S. person” is typically defined to include United States citizens, permanent resident aliens, entities organized under the laws of the United States or any jurisdiction within the United States (including their foreign branches), and any person physically located in the United States. 
  • With respect to property blocked under OFAC’s Cuban Asset Control Regulations, the reporting obligation also applies to “persons subject to the jurisdiction of the United States,” which has a similar definition but includes non-U.S. subsidiaries of U.S. entities.

What Constitutes “Blocked Property”?

  • The term “blocked property” means property in any form, whether digital, physical, tangible or intangible, that is blocked pursuant to OFAC regulations.

What is Not Considered “Blocked Property” for the Purposes of the ARBP?

  • Property that was unblocked or permitted to be transferred by an OFAC general or specific license, or that was previously blocked pursuant to a sanctions program that was terminated on or before June 30, 2026, unless the relevant specific or general license includes a condition requiring the submission of a separate unblocking report.
  • Property that was unblocked pursuant to OFAC’s removal of a person from OFAC’s SDN List.
  • Property that is subject to “reject” sanctions rather than blocking sanctions.  These prohibit transactions involving the property but do not require a U.S. person to immobilize and retain the property.
  • Assets immobilized pursuant to Directive 4 of Executive Order 14024.

How to File an ARBP with OFAC

  • Individuals or entities filing an ARBP with OFAC must use spreadsheet form TD-F 90-22.50 to make their reports. Please note that OFAC only accepts the most current version of the form (OMB No. 1505-0164).
  • Guidance on filing the 2026 ARBP, including how to complete OFAC’s ARBP spreadsheet, may be found here.
  • The ARBP must be submitted via the OFAC Reporting System (ORS).
  • First-time ORS users should email OFACReport@treasury.gov to request registration instructions in advance of the deadline. Establishing an account usually takes 24 hours.  As a result, individuals or entities expecting to file an ARBP with OFAC may wish to request access credentials well before September 30th.

Common Issues with ARBPs

According to OFAC guidance, the most common reasons for OFAC to return an ARBP submission include:

  • Incorrect ORS Report IDs;
  • Missing or incomplete sanctions target information;
  • Failure to explain the sanctions target’s property interests in the property listed on the ARBP; and
  • Formatting changes to the Excel template (e.g., password-protecting the file) that prevent OFAC from reviewing the submission.

Crowell assists financial institutions, multinational enterprises, technology companies, startups, and individuals in filing ARBPs.  Please contact any of the authors with any questions about OFAC’s blocked property report requirements.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Carlton Greene Carlton Greene

Carlton Greene is a partner in Crowell & Moring’s Washington, D.C. office and a member of the firm’s International Trade and White Collar & Regulatory Enforcement groups. He provides strategic advice to clients on U.S. economic sanctions, Bank Secrecy Act and anti-money laundering…

Carlton Greene is a partner in Crowell & Moring’s Washington, D.C. office and a member of the firm’s International Trade and White Collar & Regulatory Enforcement groups. He provides strategic advice to clients on U.S. economic sanctions, Bank Secrecy Act and anti-money laundering (AML) laws and regulations, export controls, and anti-corruption/anti-bribery laws and regulations. Carlton is the former chief counsel at FinCEN (the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network), the U.S. AML regulator responsible for administering the Bank Secrecy Act.

Photo of Anand Sithian Anand Sithian

For high-stakes internal and government investigations and complex regulatory and compliance matters, companies and individuals look to Anand to provide strategic advice and counseling, particularly on issues relating to the Bank Secrecy Act and Anti-Money Laundering (“BSA/AML”), economic sanctions, and digital assets. Anand

For high-stakes internal and government investigations and complex regulatory and compliance matters, companies and individuals look to Anand to provide strategic advice and counseling, particularly on issues relating to the Bank Secrecy Act and Anti-Money Laundering (“BSA/AML”), economic sanctions, and digital assets. Anand is resident in the firm’s New York office and a member of the firm’s International Trade, White Collar and Regulatory Enforcement, and Financial Services groups.

A former federal prosecutor, Anand leverages his government experience to guide clients through complex white-collar matters, including grand jury and regulatory investigations, enforcement proceedings, and internal investigations. Anand has deep experience in parallel criminal and civil investigations and proceedings, and often represents clients in defending against civil lawsuits related to government investigations.

Representing some of the world’s largest banks and technology companies, Anand has addressed a wide range of issues, including economic sanctions, BSA/AML; economic sanctions and national security; payments and cryptocurrency; securities laws; and cybersecurity enforcement. In the regulatory space, Anand prides himself on providing commercial and actionable advice, including in the developing areas of digital assets, FinTech, and payments.

Photo of Jeremy Iloulian Jeremy Iloulian

Recognized as a “Rising Star” in International Trade by Super Lawyers, Jeremy Iloulian advises clients globally on complex cross-border regulatory, compliance, investigative, and transactional matters and policy developments that touch U.S. national security, international trade, and foreign investment, including those relating to

Recognized as a “Rising Star” in International Trade by Super Lawyers, Jeremy Iloulian advises clients globally on complex cross-border regulatory, compliance, investigative, and transactional matters and policy developments that touch U.S. national security, international trade, and foreign investment, including those relating to U.S. export controls (EAR and ITAR), economic sanctions, anti-boycott laws, the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS), and various national security controls on fundamental research and supply chains.

Jeremy has extensive experience counseling U.S. and non-U.S. clients, including public and private companies, private equity sponsors, and nonprofits spanning a multitude of industries, including aerospace and defense, energy, entertainment, fashion, food and beverage, health care, infrastructure, technology, telecommunications, and transportation. He provides strategic guidance on managing risks for dealings in high-risk jurisdictions such as China, Russia, Venezuela, and the Middle East, among other countries and regions. He regularly advocates on behalf of such clients before the U.S. Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS), Directorate of Defense Trade Controls (DDTC), Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), Bureau of Economic Affairs (BEA), Census Bureau, Department of Energy, and Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC).

Additionally, Jeremy has previously counseled on, presented on, and published research related to international environmental law, specifically the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) and Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES).

Prior to and during law school, Jeremy interned at multiple government agencies, including the United Nations, the U.S. State Department, and the Iraqi Embassy in Washington, D.C.

Photo of Edward Goetz Edward Goetz

Edward Goetz is the Director for International Trade Services in Crowell & Moring’s Washington, D.C. office. Edward leads the firm’s international trade analysts providing practice support to the International Trade Group in the areas of customs regulations, trade remedies, trade policy, export control…

Edward Goetz is the Director for International Trade Services in Crowell & Moring’s Washington, D.C. office. Edward leads the firm’s international trade analysts providing practice support to the International Trade Group in the areas of customs regulations, trade remedies, trade policy, export control, economic sanctions, anti-money laundering (AML), anti-corruption/anti-bribery, and antiboycott. He has extensive government experience providing information and interpretive guidance on the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) concerning the export of defense articles, defense services, and related technical data. He also assists attorneys with matters involving the Export Administration Regulations (EAR), economic sanctions, AML, anti-corruption/anti-bribery, and trade remedies.